(Christian Gallery News Service, Sep 2, 2002) A new law passed by the California legislature is built on a lie. But the problem is not confined to California. The California law is an example of how the seminal lies released in this nation when the Supreme Court decided people have a right to privately kill their own children are continuing to grow and are spawning an entire edifice of “privacy” and “harassment” laws that are themselves predicated on an entirely new generation of lies.

Instead of the mainstream news media resisting the spread of lies, it has become the primary pipeline through which the lies are spread.

The Associated Press reported on August 29, 2002, that the California General Assembly passed a bill that is designed to protect the privacy of abortion clinic staff and patients. The bill would allow doctors, nurses, patients and volunteers at abortion clinics to enroll in California's Safe At Home program, which was created in 1998 to keep confidential the home addresses of domestic violence survivors. The legislation, which has already passed the state Senate, aims to prevent antiabortion groups from publishing on the Internet the addresses of abortion doctors and patients.

The law, entitled bill AB 797 , explains why the people listed above need protection. The most significant language of the bill can be found here:

"CHAPTER 3.2. ADDRESS CONFIDENTIALITY FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE SERVICE PROVIDERS, EMPLOYEES, VOLUNTEERS, AND PATIENTS

6215.

(d) Nationally, between 1992 and 1996, the number of reproductive health care service providers declined by 14 percent. Nearly one out of every four women must travel more than 50 miles to obtain reproductive health care services dealing with the termination of a pregnancy. There exists a fear on the part of physicians to enter the reproductive health care field and to provide reproductive health care services."

The Law Built Upon A Lie

The bill is referring to, as anyone knows who has had the slightest interest in legalized abortion over the last four years, the Web site published by the Christian Gallery News Service (your present Internet location) called The Nuremberg Files .

The main problem with the bill? It is built upon a false premise--a lie in layperson language.

Not only is the bill built upon a lie, it is built upon a lie that has been refuted numerous times by me on national television and by official court documents quoting testimony delivered under oath in various federal court venues.

But that's not what the California politicians tell the people of California.

The law says, "From one Web site list that includes personal information of reproductive health care service providers, seven persons have been murdered and 14 have been injured."

In that context, "From one Web site…seven persons have been murdered…" implies the people were on the list before they were murdered and their having been on the list was a possible cause and effect connector to their injury. If their names were not on the list before they were attacked, the possibility that the list can be connected to their attack disappears--except in the minds of unreasonable people who are interested not in fact but in attack by any means, no matter how unreasonable.

The Lie

No person listed on the Nuremberg Files was ever attacked after they were listed! Every person on the list who has ever been attacked or killed was put on the list after they were attacked. Or to say the same thing another way: Before and up until the time they were attacked, their names were not on the Nuremberg Files list.

You don’t have to take my word for it. Irrefutable verification has been part of Federal Court records since at least early 1999 when Planned Parenthood attorneys, in the lawsuit named Planned Parenthood of Willamette (PP) v. American Coalition of Life Activists, Inc. (ACLA) submitted a printed copy of the Nuremberg Files list to the federal court in Portland, Or.

As is normal with computer printouts of web sites, the date was printed on the copies of my Web site Planned Parenthood presented to the court. Planned Parenthood’s own documents prove conclusively that prior to Barnett Slepian’s death in October, 1998, the Nuremberg Files did not list his name or the names of any person who had been attacked or killed in abortion related terrorist actions. Those documents are a matter of public record and available to any person who takes the time to obtain them.

Below you can see the contents of the document presented by Planned Parenthood in federal court. Notice that the list does not include anyone connected to abortion related terrorism, nor does it include the legend for the “strikethrough” graphic device that was, in 2002, named a “true threat” by the latest ninth circuit federal court ruling.

ALLEGED ABORTIONISTS AND THEIR ACCOMPLICES

Send Us New Evidence to:
PO Box 1281, Carrollton, Ga, 30116

OR
Click Here To Email Evidence or Feedback.

ABORTIONISTS: the shooters

All the national news media had to do to set the stage for the California legislature to pass laws predicated upon lies was to treat the list below as if it had always contained the names of the people who were attacked. The logic was clear: if the people were on the list and then attacked or killed, there must be a cause and effect connection between the list and their attackers.

That logical cause and effect connection disappears the moment you realize the the names were not on the list before they were attacked.

The Nuremberg Files After Barnett Slepian Was Killed

The day after Barnett Slepian was killed, I altered the Nuremberg Files to look like the one below.

Legend:  Black font (working); Greyed-out Name (wounded); Strikethrough (fatality)

ABORTIONISTS: the baby butchers

Fighting Against the Lies

If the Nuremberg Files list was a threat to abortionists, all the publicity it has received would logically have led to a rash of terrible attacks on abortionists. The Nuremberg Files Web site has received more publicity than any abortion-related publication in the history of the world. Since 1998, literally hundreds of newspaper articles, radio and television programs have discussed the web site and given out its address. Millions of people have visited the Web site and looked at the Nuremberg Files list. But even with all that publicity, no person listed on the Nuremberg Files has been attacked after being put on the list!

Yet here we have the California legislature passing a new law designed to protect the abortion industry from news coverage and pubic demonstrations, and I'm the only journalist in the USA who bothers to notice that the law is predicated upon a lie.

If you want to have access to the truth instead of being the gullible person who believes what the ignorant national press tells you, you'll support the Christian Gallery News Service. We'll tell you the truth.

If you don't support us, you will continue to get what you are presently paying the national media to obtain: lies, more lies, and, yes, more lies.

This link takes you to a compendium of national television interviews where I did everything in my power to do exactly what I’m doing now: contradict the lies so that the truth can be found.