Computer Ethics, Fall 2019
Mondays 4:15-6:45, Corboy 208
Class 10: Nov 11
Readings
Read Baase chapter 3 on speech
Read Baase chapter 4.3-? on software patents.
The main course notes are in the Notes Organized by Topic
section on the main web page. Reading assignments, comments on the class
discussion and occasional special notices are in these week-by-week notes.
Jesse Frederik and Maurits Martijn, The new dot com bubble is
here: it's called online advertising
thecorrespondent.com/100/the-new-dot-com-bubble-is-here-its-called-online-advertising/13228924500-22d5fd24
All that worry that big companies know too much about you? It turns out
that they know next to nothing. For example, if Amazon wants to advertise
a new product on Facebook or Google, then those platforms might prefer to
show ads to known Amazon shoppers, not to people who might be interested
in that new product. This is called the selection effect:
send ads to people selected for their past interest in the item
advertised. Compare it to the advertising effect:
convert people who previously did not know about the item.
You can argue that showing ads to likely buyers isn't a bad idea. But
it's not the same as converting new sales.
Amazon accused of forcing up consumer prices: bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-11-08/amazon-merchant-lays-out-antitrust-case-in-letter-to-congress.
In the past, Amazon has been accused of a monopoly, but they have always
argued they reduce prices to consumers. This is different.
In a letter sent to federal lawmakers, an online merchant has
accused Amazon.com Inc. of forcing him and other sellers to
use the company’s expensive logistics services, which in turn forces
them to raise prices for consumers.
Google begins rollout of Chrome that no longer supports
adblocking: bleepingcomputer.com/news/software/google-begins-testing-extension-manifest-v3-in-chrome-canary.
The most controversial aspect of the
extension manifest v3 is the upcoming changes to the webRequest API. In
v3, Google has changed the API so that extensions can only monitor
browser connections, but not modify any of the content before
it's displayed.
Instead Google wants developers to use the
declarativeNetRequest API, which has the browser, not the
extension, strip content or resources from a visited web sites.
This API, though, has a limit of 30,000 rules that can be created.
American Gene Technologies International has a candidate therapy for curing
HIV: americangene.com/development-portfolio/hiv-aids.
Whether this treatment works out or not, this kind of clinical-trials
work finds no funding without the patent system.
Section 230(c)(1) is the clause that we've been talking about
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as
the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another
information content provider.
There is also 230(c)(2):
(2) Civil liability No
provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable
on account of—
(A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to
restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user
considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent,
harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not
such material is constitutionally protected;
This is seldom used, but in principle it
protects sites when removing whatever content they don't want.
CNIL v Google
...
Source Code